I would urge voters to be cautious when considering the many
promises being made by candidates who do not understand policing. Let me give
you some examples:
Robert
Teal now says he wants to increase ‘bobbies on the beat’ to 90% of the police
staff rather than the current target of 70%. Putting to one side the fact that
this may be crossing the boundary into the Chief Constable’s operational
control; what he does NOT say is where he proposes to make cuts in order to
achieve this. At a time when some forces are increasing resources to deal with
child grooming, for instance, it would appear that Mr Teal intends to
significantly reduce specialist departments.
Shaun
Wright says he would ensure all complainants of anti-social behaviour get a
response within twenty four hours. What’s the point of visiting someone at 4pm
who has phoned to report an isolated incident of drunken behaviour outside
their house at 2am? What a total waste of an officer’s valuable time. Likewise,
it would be pointless people phoning the police about a burglary the day after
bonfire night or Halloween – hard-pressed officers will all be spending the day
meeting Mr Wright’s meaningless and rigid target!
Jonathan
Arnott says he’ll have police stations open 24 hours a day. Well, as a resident
I can assure voters that I would not wish to see valuable police or civilian
staff sitting in an empty police station at four in the morning. If I need the
police at that time I want them to come to me.
Another
concern is this. Whose ideas are these? Have candidates already fully consulted
or are they, even now, before having been elected, pursuing their own
ill-thought-through whims? Of course it could just be shallow and meaningless
rhetoric to win votes.
When
you hear any of these promises, I would just ask that you please carefully
think about them.
Policing
is a serious and complex business. You are appointing someone who will affect
lives. I am standing as your PCC because I want to play my role in making South
Yorkshire safer. I have an abundance of knowledge and experience of what works
and can therefore, with credibility, pursue the type of policing the public
wants. I will not be entering any competition of attractive (and potentially
dangerous) ideas.